i refuse to believe that no one on here has read this book.

Sounds like a book I need to read. Thanks...I will order it today.

@jdirt2019

One more nutbag pea in the pod right here, Wilcock is a self conscious con in my opinion based on his lectures, and he is a reptilian, what the reptilians are of course is a matter of controversy. :)

My gf's grandma is really cool and into all of the shit that is spoken about here. She always is giving me books to read. This one had some decent info , but I felt as if it was a half assed attempt at amalgamating other people's work into a book packaged together for his cult of new age followers who exclusively follow his conferences and buy his products. Many of these supposed gurus are more interested in money than enlightening others imo.

I didn't address the author in my first post, and probably should have. As far as the man himself, Wilcock is an egomaniac and sells a lot of false hope. I really don't like the guy and can't tell if he is a conscious con, or just a useful fool for handlers higher on the food chain. As Etheric mentioned, most of the ideas in this book aren't Wilcock's. He took them from various sources, some very reputable and some very iffy. He then glued them together with some of his speculation.

There are some gems in there, but you have to have a pretty solid background in sciences and history to decipher what is actually proven, what is theoretically possible, what is alternatively possible, and what is speculation. Wilcock presents it all as fact. He sometimes started chapters with, "Having sufficiently proven A, B, and C...therefore D, E, F." When in reality, only A was proven fact, B was scientific theory, and C was scientific sounding speculation. That is the trap people can fall into.

With those warnings, I still think it is a worthwhile read for those who are open minded to all types of different possibilities, but who still have the toolbox to avoid logical traps. Is it a good read? Yes. It thought provoking? Yes. Is it true? Probably not. Just remember while reading that it is mostly speculation despite how awesome it sounds. Also, not to put down speculation; it is a legitimate part of the scientific process that develops early ideas that are not yet robust enough to be a testable, falsifiable or worthy of being a formal hypothesis.

Although Wilcock may be a fraud, this book still holds some validity. after all he was not the one conducting these experiments. this is definitely one of those "give a little, take a little books". and by that i mean you have to get a little crazy in order to grasp some of the concepts posed. I was astonished by the pyramid power section. i have done some browsing on the net and the experiments wilcock talks about seem sound. the fact that they placed a dull razor in a plexy glass and pvc constructed pyramid and its entire "self" was altered. the razor became sharp......WHAT! also the cancer cells placed in the pyramid all of a sudden rearrange to become aid to the body rather than harm. What are your opinions on Phantom DNA, another very interestig topic brought up

I figured this would be a good place to post this


i love this interview with Graham Hancock and have seen it many times, Aparently Graham had said afterwords it was one of the best interviews he had ever done.

David also is helping promote Grahams Book sale going on this week for Entangled, which is where i found out about it. - must be another one of his fraud attempts according to this thread though.